Attention Cable News Anchors...

STFU!


Sheesh.

Trying to watch the OJ Simpson sentencing hearing...and empty-headed anchors keep interjecting their inane recaps...as if we are too stupid to understand what is going on.

If I were producing any of these newscasts, I'd kick the anchors out of the newsroom and just let the cameras roll.

But then we all know that Cable News producers are dumbshits anyway, don't we:

Shock of the week: WAPO discovers that it's "journalists" are all liberal!

NO!:

Thousands of conservatives and even some moderates have complained during my more than three-year term that The Post is too liberal; many have stopped subscribing, including more than 900 in the past four weeks.

It pains me to see lost subscribers and revenue, especially when newspapers are shrinking. Conservative complaints can be wrong: The mainstream media were not to blame for John McCain's loss; Barack Obama's more effective campaign and the financial crisis were.

But some of the conservatives' complaints about a liberal tilt are valid. Journalism naturally draws liberals; we like to change the world. I'll bet that most Post journalists voted for Obama. I did. There are centrists at The Post as well. But the conservatives I know here feel so outnumbered that they don't even want to be quoted by name in a memo.

The Post lost almost a thousand subscriptions a month. Certainly, much of this is due to the fact that you can read the Post online and most Americans are tightening their belts. Why pay for what you can get online for free? The Post's main competition, The Washington Times, has not been immune to the changes in the industry either.

But don't discount the frustration of readers who are tired of the bias. In a little over two months, the Post had 36 stories on "Troopergate". But enter "Tony Rezko/Obama" into the Post's search engine...and you also get 36 entries...EIGHT of them AFTER the election.

So basically the Post focused more attention in two months on a non-scandal involving the Republican Vice-Presidential candidate, than it has in two years on a real scandal involving the Democratic Presidential candidate.

Don't think that (ex)readers didn't notice.

More newspapers kiss Muslim ass (Updated w. Sunday's Opus strip)

I'm getting really tired of used to our media being so pussy-whipped by Muslims. First there is the she-male editor of the Seattle Pro Islamist Post Intelligencer refusing to run the photos of two men the FBI are interested in because they might be terrorists:




That's might be. But of course until the FBI finds them, how would we know?



Now this. Linda at Something and Half of Something discovered that this cartoon will be censored from most major newspapers on Sunday:

Can you just imagine how many urine-stained sans-a-belt slacks there were in newspaper offices across America when Berkeley Breathed submitted this comic? What a bunch of wusses. Of course these papers will all withhold the strip because they don't want to "offend" anyone.

I don't CAIR. You'll notice a link for the comic strip Opus under "funnies" down the right side of this blog. I LOVE Berkeley Breathed's work. And if he is going to slam Islamotards, I love him more.

Update: Via Hot Air, the full strip that was to appear on Sunday is here. That's "offensive"? Allahpundit and Bryan Preston analyze.