What the hell is she saying?!
"First up, she's super anti-choice. The forced-pregnancy crowd is thrilled today! (She recently had her fifth child, who has Down's syndrome.)"Fellow forced pregnancy friends: apparently we shouldn't have fifth children, especially one's that are defective. That makes us super anti-choice. Excuse me, but isn't that her choice? Or are these not the choices women are allowed to make?
The cognitive dissonance astounds me.
They're against her for her stance on life. But suddenly they "support" her when some man posts this:
Here's the quote:
"C'mon. Criticize her on the basis of her political record or experience. Don't make it about looks."
Yes. It's far worse to make a crude statement about her hotness, than it is to say she should have aborted her Down's Syndrome baby to please you.
Should we cover her beautiful face while you're ripping "defective" children from her womb? Is that your logic?
Instaupdate: Wow. Great minds think alike. Some just say it better. From Preston:
But even if a real woman (i.e. a liberal democrat) had decided to keep the little punishment, she would have been able to get equal work for equal pay while simultaneously raising a family and shattering corporate glass ceilings. Because liberal women are superwomen.
Conservative women, on the other hand, have betrayed the leftist gynochracy and must be punished.